A Path Between Honour and Ashes
- Hashtag Kalakar
- Dec 2
- 4 min read
By Aakarsh Sharma
Abstract
This essay explores the silent war that rages within every human heart—the conflict between conscience and necessity, compassion and survival. Through the allegory of a gardener who must wield a sickle to protect what he loves, it reflects on how moral purity often collides with the harsh realities of life. It questions whether honour loses meaning when it costs lives, and whether restraint becomes cowardice when it lets suffering grow. Yet, it finds redemption not in victory, but in remembrance—the willingness to grieve what one must destroy and to rebuild with gentleness afterward. A Path Between Honour and Ashes is a meditation on human choice: how to act firmly without becoming hardened, and how to let sorrow guide the hand that wields power. It asks, quietly and honestly, whether we can still remain human while walking through the ruins of necessity.
Acknowledgment
This piece is born from reflection, not research—from the ache of witnessing how easily ideals tremble under the weight of reality. I owe gratitude to every unseen soul who has ever chosen compassion when anger was easier, who has mourned quietly after doing what had to be done. Their silent strength shaped the spirit of this essay. And to the unnamed “gardener” within us all—may we never forget why we hold the sickle, nor lose the courage to plant again when the earth grows gentle.
ESSAY
There’s something I need to say ; not as a soldier, not as a leader, but as a person. It’s a thought that returns whenever I stand at the crossroads between what feels right and what must be done. We all face it, in our own ways . The moment where kindness meets necessity, where our values tremble under the weight of the world.
Sometimes, the fight isn’t on a battlefield. It’s at home, at work, in daily choices ; moments where we must take hard steps that go against what we wish were true. It could be standing up to someone we love, staying silent when truth might hurt someone fragile, or letting go of something dear because holding on would destroy more. Each of us, in some small way, wages a war between heart and reason.
When I think of this, I ask myself: how far is too far? If the choices I make to protect others end up hurting them, what worth is my compassion? If I give up my principles to make things right, do I still remain myself?
And then another voice answers which was calm, almost tired: if I hold onto ideals so tightly that they let suffering grow unchecked, am I really being moral, or just afraid? Sometimes hesitation wears the mask of virtue. Sometimes mercy needs a bit of courage — and sometimes courage looks like mercy that hurts.
I suppose there’s no perfect answer. There never was. We can’t always live by rules or slogans when life keeps asking us to choose between two kinds of wrong. Maybe all that matters is whether the choice comes from a place of care ; not pride, not fear, not hate, but care. That, I think, is what it means to be human: to choose, knowing we’ll ache for it later, and to still choose with kindness.
I’ve come to see that sometimes, we must use one thorn to remove another. But the thorn is not our hand; it’s just a tool. When the wound is healed, it must be put down. The danger begins when we start loving the thorn more than the rose we meant to save.
I think of people , parents, workers, nurses, officers etc. who do what they must, even when it breaks them a little inside. They’re not cruel; they’re carrying the burden of hard love. The kind that doesn’t celebrate what had to be done, but grieves quietly afterward. The kind that doesn’t boast of sacrifice but remembers it.
It’s like farming. When you plough the soil for new crops, small lives in the earth are disturbed. They aren’t your enemies; they were just there. You don’t rejoice in their loss, but you keep working because hunger, too, is cruel. The farmer’s heart bleeds a little, but he still sows the seed. Because he must.
That’s what I hope to be — a gardener who remembers why he holds the sickle. Who grieves after using it. Who never forgets that even when he fights weeds, he does it to let flowers grow.
There was once such a gardener. He lived in a field of thorns. For years, he tried to clear them with his hands, bleeding as he worked. One day, the king gave him a sickle. The gardener wept, “Does this make me a killer?”
The king said, “No. But if you refuse the sickle, the thorns will choke the children. Use it, but remember tools are not evil. Forgetting why we hold them is.”
The gardener used the sickle. When the work was done, he melted it and planted a tree in its place, whose shade fed those very children.
That story stays with me. Maybe because it tells me what I always forget: we can be both gentle and strong, both soft and steadfast. We can make hard choices, yet never grow hard inside. We can fight without becoming the fight itself.
So yes , I may have to do things I never wished to. I may have to make choices that ache. But I will remember why I did them. I will grieve those who were hurt, even if I had no other way. And I will hold on to the quiet vow that when the storm ends, I’ll plant again. I’ll rebuild. I’ll remember the faces I couldn’t save, not with guilt, but with the promise that their
memory will make the next act gentler.
That, I think, is the path between honour and ashes ; not of power, not of victory, but of remembrance. The path of those who must sometimes fight but never stop being human.
By Aakarsh Sharma

Great effort! Your essay shows clarity, confidence, and genuine engagement with the subject. Keep writing—you’re improving wonderfully!
Beautiful balance as to when we have cling to morals and values and sense of honour and when we have to let go of it when the situation demands us , but that too not to extent that choice becomes too easy to make